| Thanks so much for the question. I think this edition is very different than prior editions, as well as other medicine texts, in a number of ways:
First of all, the 5th edition was developed with constant input from medical students who have worked with us in ensuring relevance of the content. I don’t believe there are many texts that follow this approach.
Secondly, we sought the input of a generalist and a specialist in each field in order to create content that is accurate yet consistent within a text of medicine.
In addition, we purposefully structured the text in 3 different areas following the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine national guidelines:
- the approach to disease with emphasis of differential diagnosis
- the disease processes in a very structured format
- an ambulatory section although brief but with content (between print and on-line) that is of relevance to students
This should allow the student to acquire knowledge reading the book from somewhat different perspectives and in different areas at the same time.
Finally, we strived to be focused yet not too succinct in the development of the book. Concepts need to be understood and reasoned through to be retained; in other words a short book is not likely to help a great deal in learning because there is often no space to deliver the content in a way that can be meaningfully understood and retained. On the other hand, we also did not want to create a textbook that would be of great length as it may make reading, particularly during a time restricted clerkship period, challenging for students.
I truly appreciate the question and would be happy to answer any others. I also welcome any comments or suggestions about the book. |
