Philadelphia, PA(November 23, 2010) — People who believe their doctor or hospital would inform them if a medical error occurred are “far more forgiving” than those who doubt their health care provider would disclose the error, reports a study in the November issue of Medical Care. The journal is published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a part of Wolters Kluwer Health, a leading provider of information and business intelligence for students, professionals, and institutions in medicine, nursing, allied health, and pharmacy.
For health care providers, “publicly and credibly adopting a policy of routine error disclosure” may be the best approach to minimizing the impact of medical errors, suggests the new research, led by Lorens A. Helmchen, Ph.D., of University of Illinois, Chicago.
Confidence in Disclosure Affects Likely Responses to Medical Errors
The researchers surveyed a representative sample of Illinois residents regarding medical errors. About 40 percent of participants either had personal experience with medical errors, or had a close friend or family member who had been affected by an error.
Based on a hypothetical scenario, just ten percent of survey respondents believed their physicians would be “very likely” to tell them if a medical error occurred. About one-fourth said they would file a medical malpractice lawsuit if they were told about a medical error.
Respondents who trusted their doctor or hospital to disclose medical errors were no more (or less) likely to say they would sue. This was so even in a scenario where the health care provider offered to correct the problem through free additional medical treatment, and possibly a financial settlement.
However, people who trusted their health care provider to inform them about the error were more forgiving. Of the respondents who were most confident that their doctor or hospital would disclose the error, more than 60 percent said they would still recommend the provider, despite the error.
In contrast, only 30 percent of those who were skeptical about disclosure would continue to recommend the doctor or hospital. “It appears that patients’ responses to actual medical error disclosure vary by their perception of the providers’ likelihood to disclose medical errors in principle, rather than the level of information revealed,” Helmchen and coauthors write.
Disclosure of medical errors is strongly preferred by patients, and is “ethically imperative” for doctors and hospitals. Yet the most common policy is to “deny and defend” when errors occur.
“The disclosure of medical errors to patients remains rare because providers fear that it will trigger lawsuits and jeopardize their reputation,” according to the authors. Their study is one of the first to examine how patients might respond to a policy of openly disclosing and offering to remediate medical errors.
The results suggest that what patients believe about how their doctor or hospital would respond to an error has a significant impact on their behavior. Patients who trust their providers to disclose errors may be no less likely to sue, but appear more likely to forgive. “With their trust in the good intentions, albeit perhaps not the skill, of the provider largely intact, patients are less inclined to sue and more inclined to continue recommending the hospital,” Helmchen and coauthors write.
Conversely, patients who are most skeptical about disclosure may view their health care provider with “suspicion and frustration”-even if they are told an error has occurred. Adopting a clear policy on error disclosure up front may help health care providers to fulfill their obligation to tell patients about errors while minimizing the damage caused by disclosure, the researchers believe.
About Medical Care
Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. Medical Care provides timely reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services. In addition, numerous special supplementary issues that focus on specialized topics are produced with each volume. Medical Care is the official journal of the Medical Care Section of the American Public Health Association. Visit the journal website at www.lww-medicalcare.com.
About Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW) is a leading international publisher for healthcare professionals and students with nearly 300 periodicals and 1,500 books in more than 100 disciplines publishing under the LWW brand, as well as content-based sites and online corporate and customer services. LWW is part of Wolters Kluwer Health , a leading provider of information and business intelligence for students, professionals and institutions in medicine, nursing, allied health, pharmacy and the pharmaceutical industry.
Wolters Kluwer Health is a division of Wolters Kluwer, a leading global information services and publishing company. The company provides products and services for professionals in the health, tax, accounting, corporate, financial services, legal, and regulatory sectors. Wolters Kluwer had 2008 annual revenues of €3.4 billion ($4.9 billion), employs approximately 20,000 people worldwide, and maintains operations in over 35 countries across Europe, North America, Asia Pacific, and Latin America. Wolters Kluwer is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Its shares are quoted on Euronext Amsterdam (WKL) and are included in the AEX and Euronext 100 indices. Visit www.wolterskluwer.com for information about our market positions, customers, brands, and organization.
Contacts:
Robert Dekker
Director of Communications
Wolters Kluwer Health
+1 (215) 521-8928
Robert.Dekker@wolterskluwer.com
Connie Hughes
Director, Marketing Communications
Wolters Kluwer Health Medical Research
+1 (646) 674-6348
Connie.Hughes@wolterskluwer.com